"The Education and Skills Act 2008 increased the minimum age at which young people in England can leave learning. This requires them to continue in education or training to the age of 17 from 2013 and to 18 from 2015. Young people will be able to choose whether to stay in full-time education, undertake work-based learning such as an Apprenticeship, or part-time education or training if they are employed, self-employed or volunteering for more than 20 hours per week." (Poltics.co.uk website)
This quote above demonstrates some the changes the government want to make in order to decrease the current unemployment situation amongst youngsters today but will increasing the age help or hinder our current unemployment situation for those aged 16-24? I have spoken about the subject of youth unemployment before in posts. If you haven't read these please see posts dated Sunday 20th November 2011 and Friday 24th February.
What ever your thoughts about this subject we all know someone who falls with this age category and know someone who is struggling to find or seek steady employment. The government thinks rising the age will help reduce the number of NEET's in the UK. Which means those who are not in education and training. I am sure that this will help some young people stay on and obtain more qualifications. However will it alter the situation of unemployment among the youth today?
Take a look at what Nick Clegg has to say about the increase of age in education and training.
Sitting at home with nothing to do when you're so young can knock the stuffing out of you for years. It is a tragedy for the young people involved - a ticking time bomb for the economy and our society as a whole. This problem isn't new, but in the current economic climate we urgently need to step up efforts to ensure some of our most troubled teenagers have the skills, confidence and opportunities to succeed."
This quote came from Clegg after the government decided to put in some extra funding to help 16 and 17 olds who are currently NEETs. What's interesting for me as an adviser about what he says here is how he assumes some of these teenagers are troubled. Yes this could true to some extent as I have worked with many NEETs and yes some of them are troubled. However has Mr Nick Clegg spend time with some of these teenagers to see what they are really like and understand why we have NEEts in the first place? In some cases young people see the unemployment system as a cool thing so they don't have to work. I am not generalising here as many of them want to work but if they know they can claim JS9 for up to 6 months from 16 and still not have to be in education and training where is the real motivation to find work really.
The government have all these great plans, rising the school age, extra funding for NEETs, apprenticeships, welfare to work etc. All unique and they all have pros and cons but shouldn't they be looking at why all this has happened in the first place. Yes they should be thinking about solutions definitely but if they don't go back to the root of the problem youth unemployment how can they actually help these young people. Yes the recession may have contributed to the high unemployment figures we have in the UK, not just amongst young people but amongst everyone.However its not the only reason for our high unemployment rates.
How about the fact that a large number people within the UK have poor levels of basic numeracy of literacy. There is a large number of young people who are in FE colleges who are doing level 2 courses who don't have a c or above in English or maths. These are essential subjects and some this effects how well they do on the level 2 courses. Many get stuck in a zone where they can't even pass their level 2 courses. Wouldn't it wiser to let them retake their gcse english and maths and in addition do a course they are interested in? This is also affecting employment rates because employers want to hire competent people who have the essential basic skills required to do work effectively.
Please see the above link about the number of people without gcse maths and English. The skills for life website also says this will impact young peoples future. So yes the government have all these incentives but I think they also need to look at how they can support those who aren't academic the average students who don't always get a A in Maths. What happens to them? If we have the best of the best what about everyone else. Stricter rules need to put in place so that we have better literacy and numeracy levels. Which ever way you look at this I think this is a factor that effects employment.
No comments:
Post a Comment